2024 AI Odyssey Part 2: How to build a responsible AI for the whole world?

As the momentum for global regulation in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to grow, concerns about potential negative impacts and ethical considerations are at the forefront. In this second part of the series, we delve deeper into the key reasons behind the push for global AI regulation, exploring challenges, ethical considerations, and the crucial need for a robust regulatory framework. We have insights from industry leaders Suchi Jain, Minhyun Kim, Sheshgiri Kamath, Archit Agarwal, and Devdatta Potnis, who shed light on the complexities of striking a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding against the risks associated with unchecked AI advancements.

Also read:

2024 AI Odyssey Part-1: AI’s dark underbelly and the road to regulation

A robust AI regulatory framework should prioritize ethical principles like fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, and societal impact, says Sheshgiri Kamath, CEO and Co-founder of Kapture CX. He adds that this involves mitigating bias, ensuring understandable decision-making, balancing data access with individual rights, establishing clear responsibility frameworks, and implementing meaningful consent mechanisms.

“Proactive measures to address socioeconomic impacts, such as job displacement, are crucial. Achieving a balance between innovation and ethical principles requires collaborative efforts among technologists, policymakers, and society for responsible AI development and deployment,” Kamath says.

The need for global regulation in the AI space is gaining momentum, as there have been growing concerns about the potential negative impacts of this powerful technology, opines Suchi Jain, General Manager, Madison Digital.

According to Jain, some key reasons behind this consensus are:

Mitigating risks: AI algorithms, influenced by inputs, can develop biases, leading to discrimination and even weaponization. The scope of harm extends beyond physical damage to encompass mental well-being, as evident in social media dynamics.
Trust issues: The absence of clear regulations fosters distrust and impedes the public's acceptance of AI. Given its nascent stage and widespread availability, trust issues are likely to intensify.
Levelling the playing field: Varying approaches to AI regulation across different countries create an uneven playing field for businesses. Challenges such as data privacy, intellectual property, and algorithmic bias transcend national boundaries, necessitating global regulations to prevent conflicts and ensure consistency. However, the absence of global AI regulation poses significant challenges for industries and societies.
Dispersed approach: Divergent national regulations create conflicting requirements, impeding international collaboration and causing confusion for businesses with operations spanning multiple borders.
Regulatory gaps: Unregulated domains, such as autonomous weapons or facial recognition systems, become fertile grounds for misuse and ethical concerns. The lack of global standards hampers proactive resolution of these issues.
Restrictive regulations: Overly stringent regulations can impede innovation and curtail the potential benefits of AI. Striking a delicate balance between promoting responsible development and fostering innovation is imperative.
Enforcement challenges: Enforcing global regulations across diverse legal systems and jurisdictions poses complexities and requires substantial resources. International cooperation and harmonization of enforcement mechanisms are essential.
Interconnectedness of global economies: The intricate connections within the global economy make inconsistencies in AI regulations among countries a barrier to the international flow of AI technologies.

According to Jain, addressing these challenges requires a collaborative effort to establish global standards that mitigate risks, build trust, level the playing field, and ensure responsible innovation. A harmonised regulatory framework can foster the responsible development and deployment of AI, benefiting industries and societies on a global scale.

Robust regulatory framework

As AI continues its rapid evolution, the need for a robust regulatory framework becomes increasingly apparent. The critical question is: What key principles and ethical considerations should form the bedrock of any regulatory framework for AI? The stakeholders need to navigate the delicate balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding individuals and societies from the potential risks posed by unchecked advancements in AI.

According to Minhyun Kim, CEO of AI Network, two things are paramount. “The first is transparency. Our foundational AI models, like GPT and those that come next, have to be developed, trained, and governed in the open. They need to be subject to scrutiny by experts and regulators, not kept in a black box. We can look to the success of two blockchain networks, Bitcoin and Ethereum, for proof that transparency is possible. Both technologies are open source, meaning that the code and governance decisions are publicly available for anyone to examine. Given their impact, it’s safe to say that they are a model for how AI should be developed and governed,” says Kim.

The second, according to Kim, is copyright and data ownership protection. “We can’t lose sight of the fact that, unless already in the open source, the data used to train generative AI models is owned by the people who created it. Features like citations, and even compensation, should be part of our foundational AI models by design. This will have the added effect of helping us understand the source of the AI output so that we can conduct our own due diligence,” he adds.

Kim is certain that AI regulation won’t have a negative impact on innovation. “Quite the opposite is true, in fact. Regulation will increase legitimacy and trust in the industry, which will ultimately pave the way for an influx of investor capital and mainstream adoption. These are the things that drive beneficial innovation.”

Unregulated AI development and deployment pose various potential risks to individuals, societies, and the global community, says Suchi Jain. According to her addressing these concerns requires a comprehensive global regulatory approach:

Key concerns

Ethical issues:

AI algorithms may perpetuate biases from training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes in areas like loan approvals, job applications, and criminal justice. Collection and analysis of vast personal data by AI systems raise privacy concerns and the potential for misuse. Black-box algorithms hinder transparency and accountability in areas like autonomous vehicles and financial technology.

Societal issues:

AI-driven automation could result in widespread job losses, causing economic hardship and social unrest. Advanced AI-powered surveillance tools threaten individual privacy, potentially leading to Orwellian dystopias. Moral and legal concerns arise with the development and deployment of autonomous weapons systems.

Technological issues:

AI systems are vulnerable to hacks or manipulation, posing risks of accidents, misinterpretations, and physical harm. Existential risks are raised by the potential development of superintelligent AI surpassing human intelligence.

Addressing risks with global regulation: To mitigate these risks and foster innovation and collaboration, a globally acceptable regulatory mechanism can be established.
Establishing ethical principles: Defining global ethical principles for AI development and deployment guides prioritization of fairness, transparency, and accountability.
Data privacy and security standards: Clear regulations around data collection, usage, and storage protect individual privacy and prevent misuse of personal information.
Algorithmic transparency and bias mitigation: Requiring explanations for AI decisions and addressing biases in training data builds trust and prevents discriminatory outcomes.
Risk assessment and safety protocols: Implementing standardised risk assessment frameworks and safety protocols for high-risk AI applications minimise potential harm.
International cooperation and enforcement: Collaborative efforts between governments and industry stakeholders ensure consistent regulations and effective enforcement across borders.
Balancing innovation and regulation: Finding the right balance is crucial. Overly restrictive regulations can stifle progress, while unregulated development poses significant risks. Global collaboration and ongoing dialogue are essential to developing adaptable regulations that foster responsible AI while addressing the outlined concerns.

Suchi Jain says that any regulatory framework governing AI should be grounded in fundamental principles and ethical considerations that strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding individuals and societies from harm. Here are key elements that Jain believes should be at the core:

Human agency and oversight: Ultimately, AI systems must be under human control. This necessitates maintaining human oversight throughout the entire lifecycle, from development to deployment and decision-making processes.
Fairness and non-discrimination: Regulations should ensure that AI systems do not perpetuate or exacerbate existing biases and inequalities. Developers should actively address bias in training data and algorithms, promoting fair and equitable outcomes.
Privacy and security: Robust privacy regulations and security measures are imperative for safeguarding personal data used in training and operating AI systems. Individuals should retain control over their data and be fully informed about its use.
Accountability and responsibility: Establishing clear mechanisms for holding developers and users accountable for the actions and potential harms caused by AI systems is crucial. This may involve legal frameworks, independent oversight bodies, and ethical guidelines for developers.
Risk assessment and mitigation: High-risk AI applications, such as autonomous weapons or healthcare algorithms, should undergo thorough risk assessments. Implementing robust safety protocols is essential to minimize potential harm and ensure responsible deployment.
Sustainability and environmental impact: The development and deployment of AI should take into account its environmental impact. Ensuring alignment with sustainable development goals contributes to the responsible and sustainable use of AI technology.

In summary, explains Jain, a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI should encompass these core principles to navigate the delicate balance between fostering innovation and addressing the potential risks associated with AI technology.

Any AI regulatory framework should prioritize transparency, accountability, fairness, and privacy, says Archit Agarwal, Founder and CEO, Tikshark Solutions.

“Balancing innovation and protection requires iterative adjustments, continuous evaluation, and collaboration between policymakers, industry stakeholders, and ethicists to ensure responsible AI development and deployment. To ensure international acceptance and enforcement of AI regulations, a collaborative approach involving global stakeholders, transparent communication, and cultural sensitivity is crucial. Establishing adaptable frameworks that accommodate diverse economic and technological contexts promotes harmonised compliance and fosters a shared commitment to ethical AI practices,” says Agarwal.

Key principles for AI regulation encompass transparency, fairness, privacy protection, security measures, accountability, and human oversight, says Devdatta Potnis, CEO, Animeta. These principles, he adds, strike a balance between fostering innovation and preventing potential harm. To ensure international acceptance and enforcement of AI regulations, advocate for multilateral collaboration, consider cultural nuances, implement regulations gradually, support capacity building, and involve the public for diverse perspectives. This comprehensive approach paves the way for a responsible and globally accepted AI regulatory landscape.

Global acceptance

It is equally important to take steps to ensure the acceptance and enforcement of AI regulations on an international scale, considering diverse cultural, economic, and technological landscapes.

The first step is to ensure that the regulations need to be truly reflective of the diverse, globalised world in which we live, asserts Minhyun Kim.

“If they are decreed by only a small number of powerful countries or left to large corporations to decide, the chances are high that acceptance levels will be low and enforcement will be an expensive proposition for those making the rules. Step two is to ensure that the technology is developed and governed in the open source. Not only will this promote the sharing of knowledge and innovation, but it will also increase the level of trust and accountability between nations. The challenge lies in the fact that traditional regulatory processes may prove to be too sluggish to effectively keep up with the rapid advancements in open-source AI. Alternative governance mechanisms, such as decentralized autonomous organisations (DAOs), hold promise because they are designed to govern open-source software with better agility and responsiveness. They also, by design, bring together a more diverse set of stakeholders,” says Kim.

The third, according to Kim, is to ensure incentives are in place for adherence to regulations. “We can look at the international network of tax havens and bank secrecy to better understand what might happen if AI regulation isn’t beneficial for all. Countries are likely to establish their own regulatory frameworks, with some intentionally opting for limited regulations to attract AI companies to operate within their jurisdictions,” he concludes.

According to Suchi Jain, securing acceptance and enforcement of AI regulations globally is a multifaceted challenge that requires thoughtful consideration of diverse cultural, economic, and technological contexts, says. She suggests the following measures:

International forums and knowledge sharing: Establish dedicated platforms for the exchange of information, sharing best practices, and enhancing capacity across nations.
Harmonisation efforts: Promote collaboration between regulatory bodies to identify common ground on fundamental principles and terminology, working towards creating interoperable regulatory frameworks.
Technology transfer and support: Aid developing countries in enhancing their regulatory capacity and infrastructure through knowledge sharing, training programs, and technical assistance.
Inclusive consultations: Engage stakeholders from varied backgrounds and regions to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive regulatory perspective.
Independent oversight bodies: Form independent bodies with international representation to oversee compliance, investigate potential violations, and ensure neutrality and trust.
Standardised reporting and auditing: Implement common reporting standards for AI systems and activities globally, promoting transparency and accountability.
Incentive and disincentive mechanisms: Develop reward systems for compliant behaviour and graduated penalties for non-compliance, fostering responsible development and adoption.

Additional considerations:

Public awareness and education: Heighten public awareness about the potential benefits and risks of AI, building trust and cultivating informed support for regulatory measures.
Private sector engagement: Encourage active involvement of the private sector in formulating and implementing responsible AI practices and regulations.
Focus on capacity building: Invest in enhancing regulatory capacity and expertise in developing countries to ensure the effective implementation of international frameworks.